THE LINGUISTIC DIMENSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTING ENGLISH TERMINOLOGY IN MASS MEDIA DISCOURSE

Authors

  • Abdazova A’loxon Rivojiddin qizi Student, group 2102 Department of information service and public relations Uzbekistan State World Languages University

Keywords:

environmental reporting, mass media discourse, linguistic dimension, English terminology, language and environment, media framing, public perception, policy formulation, discursive strategies, sustainability.

Abstract

This article explores the crucial role of language, particularly English
terminology, in environmental reporting within mass media discourse. It delves into
the intricate relationship between language, communication, and environmental
issues, highlighting how the choice and use of terminology shape public perception,
policy formulation, and societal responses to environmental challenges. By
analyzing the linguistic dimension of environmental reporting, the article aims to
shed light on the power dynamics inherent in the selection and framing of
environmental narratives. Through a multidisciplinary approach drawing from
linguistics, media studies, and environmental science, it examines the nuances of
language use, including terminology adoption, linguistic framing, and discursive
strategies employed by media outlets. Additionally, the article explores the
implications of linguistic choices on audience comprehension, engagement, and
action regarding environmental issues. Ultimately, it underscores the importance of
linguistic awareness and precision in environmental reporting to foster informed
discourse, policy deliberation, and collective action toward sustainability.

References

Fairclough, N. (1995). Media Discourse. London: Edward Arnold.

Carvalho, A. (2007). Ideological cultures and media discourses on scientific

knowledge: re-reading news on climate change. Public Understanding of

Science, 16(2), 223–243.

Painter, J. (2010). Climate change in the media: Reporting risk and uncertainty.

London: I.B. Tauris.

Nerlich, B., & Jaspal, R. (2012). Metaphors we die by? Geoengineering,

metaphors, and the argument from catastrophe. Metaphor and Symbol, 27(2),

–147.

Phillips, L. J., & Hardy, C. (2002). Discourse analysis: Investigating processes

of social construction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass

media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187.

Aaltonen, S., & Ørsten, M. (2011). Global and local voices in news coverage of

climate change: a comparative study of journalistic source usage in Africa, Asia,

Europe, and the Americas. Global Environmental Change, 21(2), 534–542.

Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm.

Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58

Downloads

Published

2024-02-24

How to Cite

THE LINGUISTIC DIMENSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTING ENGLISH TERMINOLOGY IN MASS MEDIA DISCOURSE. (2024). INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MEDICINE, SCIENCE, AND EDUCATION, 1(2), 69-74. https://universalconference.us/universalconference/index.php/icmse/article/view/563