COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS OF LEXICAL CHOICES IN E. FITZGERALD’S VS. E. HERON-ALLEN’S TRANSLATIONS OF OMAR KHAYYAM’S RUBAIYAT
Keywords:
translation studies, lexical choices, Omar Khayyam, Rubaiyat, Edward FitzGerald, Edward Heron-Allen, Persian poetry, poetic diction, literal translation, comparative analysisAbstract
This study examines the lexical strategies employed by Edward FitzGerald and Edward Heron-Allen in their English translations of Omar Khayyam’s Rubáiyát. Using five quatrains from each translator, the research analyzes patterns in word choice, metaphorical density, imagery, and cultural specificity. FitzGerald’s translation exhibits a poetic, imaginative lexicon that prioritizes aesthetic dramatization, symbolic imagery, and universalized philosophical reflection, whereas Heron-Allen’s lexicon emphasizes literal accuracy, ethical clarity, and preservation of Persian cultural and religious context. The comparison illustrates how lexical decisions shape interpretive and emotional impact, highlighting the broader tension between creative adaptation and philological fidelity in literary translation.
Downloads
References
1. FitzGerald, E. (1859). The Rubáiyát of Omar Khayyám (1st ed.). London: Bernard Quaritch.
2. Heron-Allen, E. (1898). The Rubáiyát of Omar Khayyám: A Literal Translation. London: George Bell & Sons.
3. Bassnett, S. (2013). Translation studies (4th ed.). Routledge.
4. Venuti, L. (2012). The translator’s invisibility: A history of translation (2nd ed.). Routledge.
5. Shafique, N. (2006). Omar Khayyam: A study in Persian literature and translation. Journal of Middle Eastern Literature
6. Tymoczko, M. (2010). Translation, resistance, activism. University of Massachusetts Press.
