THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CLIL (CONTENT AND LANGUAGE INTEGRATED LEARNING) TECHNOLOGY IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE LESSONS

Authors

  • Dusiyarova Shakhrizoda Student of Uzbek National Pedagogical University
  • Xoqberdiyeva Dilnova Student of Uzbek National Pedagogical University
  • Oripova Muhabbat PhD, associate professor Uzbek National Pedagogical University Department of the Theory and Methodology of English

Keywords:

CLIL, content learning, foreign language, bilingual education, teaching methodology, cognitive development, language acquisition, classroom practice.

Abstract

This article investigates the effectiveness of CLIL (Content and Language Integrated Learning) in foreign language education. CLIL is an innovative pedagogical approach where students learn a subject and a foreign language simultaneously. This dual-focused method enhances language proficiency while promoting cognitive, cultural, and content knowledge. The study explores theoretical foundations of CLIL, its application in foreign language classrooms, the role of teachers, and the benefits and challenges of this methodology. Practical examples and case studies are provided to illustrate the implementation of CLIL in real educational settings

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge University Press.

[2] Mehisto, P., Marsh, D., & Frigols, M.J. (2008). Uncovering CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning in Bilingual and Multilingual Education. Macmillan.

[3] Dalton-Puffer, C. (2011). Content and Language Integrated Learning: From Practice to Principles? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 182–204.

[4] Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge University Press.

[5] Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.

[6] Brinton, D.M., Snow, M.A., & Wesche, M. (2003). Content-Based Second Language Instruction. University of Michigan Press.

[7] Coyle, D. (2007). The CLIL Framework. Cambridge University Press.

[8] Marsh, D. (2002). CLIL/EMILE – The European Dimension. University of Jyväskylä.

[9] Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J.M. (2010). Immersion and CLIL in English: More Differences than Similarities. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 23(2), 95–107.

[10] Ball, P., & Lindsay, C. (2013). CLIL: Linking Theory to Practice. ELT Journal, 67(2), 179–189.

[11] Dalton-Puffer, C., & Nikula, T. (2006). Pragmatics of Content and Language Integrated Learning. John Benjamins

Downloads

Published

2025-11-16

How to Cite

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CLIL (CONTENT AND LANGUAGE INTEGRATED LEARNING) TECHNOLOGY IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE LESSONS. (2025). PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS OF SCIENTIFIC AND INNOVATIVE RESEARCH, 2(10), 103-112. https://universalconference.us/index.php/pssir/article/view/5824