ACTIVATING PRIOR KNOWLEDGE: THE IMPACT OF PRE-READING TASKS ON READING PROFICIENCY

Authors

  • Mustokova Sitora Umurzokovna University of Management and Future Technologies Department of Philology and Languages

Keywords:

Pre-reading activities; reading comprehension; prior knowledge activation; metacognitive strategies; vocabulary instruction; reading pedagogy; intrinsic motivation; ESL reading strategies; cognitive scaffolding; purposeful reading

Abstract

      This article explores the critical role of pre-reading activities in fostering effective reading comprehension within language education. Challenging the notion that reading is a passive decoding process, the author argues that successful comprehension is a dynamic and strategic endeavor that begins before engagement with the text. Drawing on foundational theories and empirical research, the article outlines five key functions of pre-reading strategies: activating prior knowledge, fostering anticipation and intrinsic motivation, pre-teaching vocabulary and conceptual frameworks, establishing reading purposes, and developing metacognitive awareness. Through detailed examples and scholarly references, the author emphasizes that pre-reading tasks are not ancillary, but essential tools for enhancing reader engagement, comprehension, and long-term literacy development. The article concludes by advocating for the deliberate and consistent integration of pre-reading strategies in reading instruction to cultivate more strategic, confident, and independent readers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Smith, J., 2018 Smith, J. (2018). Enhancing reading comprehension through strategic pre-reading activities. Educational Review, 42(1), 55-68.

2. Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 1, pp. 255-291). Longman.

3. Brown, K., & Lee, J. (2020). The impact of pre-reading strategies on ESL learners' comprehension. Journal of Second Language Teaching, 15(2), 112-128.

4. Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 403-422). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

5. Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press.

6. Pardo, L. S. (2004). What every teacher needs to know about comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 58(3), 272-280.

7. Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 1, pp. 353-394). Longman.

8. Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2011). Teaching and researching reading (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-13

How to Cite

ACTIVATING PRIOR KNOWLEDGE: THE IMPACT OF PRE-READING TASKS ON READING PROFICIENCY. (2025). INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTERDISCIPLINARY SCIENCE, 2(6), 234-237. https://universalconference.us/index.php/icms/article/view/4667