METONYMY AS A COGNITIVE MECHANISM IN THE FORMATION OF PHRASEOLOGICAL MEANING: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ENGLISH AND UZBEK

Authors

  • Mustafaev Elyor Independent Researcher at Andijan State Institute of Foreign Languages

Keywords:

conceptual metonymy, phraseological meaning, verbal phraseological unit, cognitive mechanism, metaphtonymy

Abstract

This paper examines conceptual metonymy as a cognitive process that contributes to meaning creation in the phraseology of English and Uzbek. In traditional linguistics, metonymy is usually described as a semantic mechanism motivated by proximity between entities. By contrast, conceptual metonymy is defined as a process in which a salient aspect of a cognitive domain serves as an access point to another aspect within the same domain. This perspective is particularly appropriate for phraseological units, whose figurative meanings are typically grounded in embodied experience, culture, and conventional conceptual structures. In this study, a qualitative comparative approach is adopted, and several verbal phraseological units in English and Uzbek are analysed in terms of the metonymic relationships that underlie their meanings. The analysis compares the manifestations of metonymy in English and Uzbek verbal phraseological units, highlighting their shared and language-specific cognitive and semantic characteristics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barcelona, A. (Ed.). (2000). Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective. Mouton de Gruyter.

Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge University Press.

Goossens, L. (1990). Metaphtonymy: The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action. Cognitive Linguistics, 1(3), 323–342.

Khakimova, M. K., & Rahmatova, F. Y. (2025). Analysis of cognitive metaphor and metonymy in Uzbek. Foreign Languages in Uzbekistan, 11(5), 63–80. https://doi.org/10.36078/1762248673.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.

Langacker, R. W. (1993). Reference-point constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 4(1), 1–38.

Muzaffarova, Z. U. (2025). The expression of scenario metonymy in the Uzbek language. International Journal of Literature and Languages, 5(8), 38–40. https://doi.org/10.37547/ijll/Volume05Issue08-08.

Radden, G., & Kövecses, Z. (1999). Towards a theory of metonymy. In K.-U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought. John Benjamins.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-12

How to Cite

METONYMY AS A COGNITIVE MECHANISM IN THE FORMATION OF PHRASEOLOGICAL MEANING: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ENGLISH AND UZBEK. (2026). INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MODERN DEVELOPMENT OF PEDAGOGY AND LINGUISTICS, 3(7), 14-20. https://universalconference.us/index.php/icmdpl/article/view/7672