Published April 10, 2024
| Version v1
Conference paper
Open
ANALYZING THE STRUCTURAL AND SEMANTIC CHARACTERISTICS OF PHRASEOLOGY IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK, FOCUSED ON POLITICAL MEDIA DISCOURSE
- 1. 2 nd year student Master's department Uzbekistan State World Languages University
Description
This study examines the structural and semantic aspects of
phraseology in English and Uzbek languages within the context of political media
texts. It investigates the linguistic features, connotations, and cultural implications
of idiomatic expressions and fixed phrases used in political discourse. Through a
comparative analysis, the research aims to uncover similarities and differences in
the usage, structure, and underlying meanings of phraseological units in these
languages within the realm of political communication.
Files
Razzoqova Sadoqat 111-114.pdf
Files
(116.7 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:1fab18b92aaa398a59794e4e5d97dd90
|
116.7 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- 1. Alimardonov, A. (2020). The Comparative Study of English and Uzbek Phraseological Units in Political Discourse. Linguistics and Culture Review, 6(1), 25-37.
- 2. Chitra, D. (2017). Comparative Study of Phraseology in English and Tamil Languages. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 3(2), 60- 68.2. Chitra, D. (2017). Comparative Study of Phraseology in English and Tamil Languages. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 3(2), 60- 68.
- 3. Crystal, D. (2008). A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. John Wiley & Sons, p 48-51
- 4. Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (2013). Why Idioms Mean What They Do. Oxford University Press, pp 123-126.
- 5. Kulikov, L. I. (2012). Structural Semantics of Phraseological Units. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 16(2), 87-97
- 6. Pauwels, P. (2018). Analyzing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. Routledge.
- 7. Skorczynska, H. (2015). Phraseology in the Digital Age: Challenges and Opportunities. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG, p 69