Published April 2, 2025
| Version v1
Conference paper
Open
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF METAPHORICAL AND FIGURATIVE MEANINGS
Creators
- 1. Research Doctorate student, Tashkent State University of Uzbek Language and Literature named after Alisher Navoi Assistant Professor, Tashkent International University
Description
The study employs a contrastive analysis approach to examine how metaphor and figurative language shape cultural perceptions and conceptual frameworks. Findings indicate that while universal cognitive mechanisms underlie metaphorical expressions, language-specific socio-cultural factors influence their semantic and pragmatic applications. The research contributes to cross-linguistic and intercultural studies, enhancing our understanding of metaphorization processes in different linguistic traditions.
Files
147-150.pdf
Files
(569.2 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:d125e2cd9b52ac4df0b167ba0d9f6c4d
|
569.2 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- 1. Маруфова, Ю., & Исраил, М. (2023). Comparative analysis of phraseological units with a human component in english, russian and uzbek. The use of metaphor. СМИ. Язык и культура. Перевод., 1(1), 240-245.
- 2. Arutyunova N. D. Metaphor and discourse. The theory is metaphorical. - M., 1990. - p. 5-32.
- 3. Dobrovol'skij, D., & Piirainen, E. (2021). Figurative language: Cross-cultural and cross-linguistic perspectives (Vol. 350). Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.
- 4. Raymond W. Gibbs Jr. -"Metaphor in Discourse and Literature: Cognitive Perspectives" -1994 -Cambridge University Press -368 pages
- 5. Nasrullaeva G. Issues of sociolinguistic features and lexicographic research of anthropomorphic metaphor. Phil. Dissertation abstract written for obtaining the scientific degree of Ph.D. - Ferghana. 2022. 58 p
- 6. Yusupov U.K. Contrastive Linguistics of the English and Uzbek languages. Tashkent: Akademnashr, 2013. P. 27- 262